In the Old Testament prophetic Book of Daniel, King Nebuchadnezzar was described to have seen a large statue in a dream. Only the Jewish prophet Daniel was able to interpret the dream. Later, Daniel himself had a dream about four beasts; his dream paralleled Nebuchadnezzar’s dream. The parts of the statue, as well as the beasts, were found to represent kingdoms or nations upon the earth—the first of which existed at the time, and the remainder of which, eventually, would arise.
In the New Testament prophetic Book of Revelation, John described two other beasts which would arise (see also the lengthy commentary, The Chronology of Revelation). I believe these latter two beasts will be prominent relatively soon in the future of this world, near the “end of the age.” Furthermore, I suspect that their identities will be surprising to most. The beasts represent kingdoms or nations which have had, or will have, domination over the nation of Israel.
The beasts also will be representative of supernatural spiritual entities (also known as “princes”) and human leaders (also known as “kings”) who rule over nations or conglomerates of nations around the world. The prophesied righteous “seed” has passed through Abraham and the nation of Israel/Judah to the ultimate Messiah, Jesus Christ
When King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon had a dream
Historically, the sections of the statue were represented as follows:
Head of Gold
Chest & Arms of Silver
Belly & Thighs of Bronze
Legs of Iron Babylon
Medo-Persia
Greece
Rome606–539 B.C.
539–331 B.C.
331–169 B.C.
169 B.C.–476 A.D.
The final kingdom (the 2 feet and 10 toes of the statue, as an outgrowth of the legs of iron) would be one where “the people will be a mixture and will not remain united, any more than iron mixes with clay”
Daniel later had a dream about four great beasts
- a lion with wings like an eagle,
- a bear raised up on one side with three ribs between its teeth,
- a leopard with wings like a bird and four heads, and
- a terrifying, powerful beast with large iron teeth and ten horns.
While Daniel was thinking about the ten horns, another little horn, with eyes like a man, came up among them, and “three of the first horns were uprooted before it” (7:8a).
These beasts exactly paralleled the sections of the statue in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream, and the ten horns of the final beast were analogous to the ten toes of the statue. The iron legs of the statue
The obvious prophetic question is this: What are the ten horns of Daniel’s final beast, which are equivalent to the ten toes of Nebuchadnezzar’s statue? That is, if the Roman Empire ultimately fragmented into ten major parts, what are these parts? And what does the little horn, arising among them, represent?
Before addressing these questions, we first need to look at, and carefully to analyze,
- the seven heads of Daniel’s four beasts
(Daniel 7:2-7), - the four heads of Daniel’s third beast (7:6),
- Daniel’s fourth beast
(7:7), and- John’s beast out of the sea
(Revelation 13:1b-8), having ten horns and seven heads (13:1c), as well as other similarities to Daniel’s four beasts.
It is important to look more closely at the collective number of heads of Daniel’s four beasts
In a later vision
History tells us that Alexander the Great was the “prominent horn”
- Greece (ruled by Cassander),
- Asia Minor (ruled by Lysimachus), composed mostly of present-day Turkey,
- Egypt (ruled by Ptolemy I = Ptolemy Soter), and
- Mesopotamia and Syria (ruled by Seleucus I Nicator).
Therefore, the four beasts
| Babylonian Empire Grecian Empire Roman Empire Total |
1 head 1 head 4 heads 1 head |
As stated in the previous section (the seven heads of Daniel’s four beasts), upon the death of Alexander the Great (who was described as a “large horn”), four “horns” or kingdoms emerged from the Grecian Empire
- Egypt,
- Syria,
- Greece, and
- Turkey.
In some form or another, all of these have had dominion over and/or a direct affect upon Israel, God’s chosen land. The Israelites were in bondage for hundreds of years in Egypt, until Moses led them out
The fourth beast that Daniel saw in his dream/vision
The western “leg” of the Roman Empire fragmented into numerous regions, populated by various peoples. Over time, the Germanic tribes set up new kingdoms: the Visigoths in Spain, the Franks in Gaul (which eventually became France and Germany), the Angles and Saxons in Britain, and the Lombards in Italy. Through uncountable changes over many centuries, the western Roman Empire has evolved into most of today’s European Union (EU). By and large, the overwhelmingly dominant power of today’s western “leg” of the old Roman Empire lies with five nations, which I believe may be considered to be the 5 “toes” on one foot of Nebuchadnezzar’s statue:
- Britain,
- France,
- Germany,
- Italy, and
- Spain.
In 293 A.D., the Roman Emperor Diocletian shifted the center of the Roman Empire eastward, to Byzantium. The eastern “leg” of the empire became known as the Byzantine Empire or the Eastern Roman Empire. In 326, Constantine renamed Byzantium as Constantinopolis. Today, this is Istanbul, Turkey.
Over centuries, the Byzantine Empire also underwent many changes. Finally, in 1453, the Osmanli, a nomadic tribe in Turkey, conquered the Byzantine capital, Constantinople. Thus began the Ottoman Empire, named after the first ruler, Osman. The great Ottoman Empire, essentially, was a continuance of the Byzantine or eastern “leg” of the Roman Empire, and it lasted for almost six centuries, until 1924. The Ottoman Turks headed one of the greatest imperial powers in history. The Ottoman Empire was a theocracy, with the sultans dedicated to the advancement of the Sunni branch of Islam through military means.
With the decline of the Ottoman Empire, four dominant states arose: Greece, Turkey, Syria, and Egypt—which were restorations of the four heads of Daniel’s third beast, the Grecian Empire. The dominant power of today’s eastern “leg” of the old Roman Empire lies with six nations—five of which (and time will tell which five), I believe, may be considered the 5 “toes” on the other foot of Nebuchadnezzar’s statue:
- Egypt,
- Greece,
- Iran,
- Iraq,
- Syria, and
- Turkey.
John described a great beast
The ancient prophet Jeremiah referred to Babylon as a “destroying mountain”
Now, it has been shown how Daniel’s four beasts
The “head” or kingdom which was in power at the time John lived and wrote (described by him as “one is”—17:10) was:
- Egypt,
- Assyria,
- Babylon,
- Medo-Persia, and
- Greece.
The “head” or kingdom which was yet to come (described by John as the one which “has not yet come”—17:10) was:
- Rome plus its extension, the Ottoman Empire (an expansion of Turkey).
- revived Rome, that is the European Union.
Note, from the seven heads of Daniel’s four beasts section, that four of the kingdoms listed—Greece, Turkey, Egypt, and Syria (Assyria)—were the sub-kingdoms into which the Grecian Empire fragmented. Therefore, whichever way it is viewed, I believe the seven “heads” seen by John
With the fundamental funding and establishment of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) on October 17 and 24, 2006, and the ENP’s official implementation on January 1, 2007, the seventh kingdom appears to be underway. (As a confirmation of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EuroMed), the ENP may be the fulfillment of
- Egypt,
- Assyria (modern-day Syria),
- Babylon (modern-day Iraq),
- Medo-Persia (modern-day Iran),
- Greece,
- Rome (modern-day Italy and/or the Vatican) plus Ottoman Empire (modern-day Turkey), and
- European Union and its extensions.
|
|
|
Pertaining to the ten toes of Nebuchadnezzar’s statue
- Britain,
- France,
- Germany,
- Italy,
- Spain,
- Egypt,
- Greece,
- Iran,
- Iraq,
- Syria, and
- Turkey.
Another theory proposes that the great Roman Empire was fragmented into ten (10) geographical areas with the following ten peoples, seven (7) of whom eventually became most of the Europe that we know today:
Anglosaxons (English)
Franks (French)
Suevi (Portuguese)
Visigoths (Spanish)
Burgundians (Swiss) Alamanni (Germans)
Lombards (Italians)
Ostrogoths(gone after 553 A.D.)
Heruli(gone after 493 A.D.)
Vandals(gone after 534 A.D.)
This theory says that three of the above—the Ostrogoths, the Heruli, and the Vandals—were wiped out or “uprooted”
There are at least two problems with this theory:
Yet another theory is that the European Union (EU) is the revived, and revised, modern-day Roman Empire. The two main problems with this theory are that there now are many more than ten members of the EU. Plus, these nations comprise only the western “leg” of the Roman Empire, thus completely ignoring the eastern “leg.”
After describing the fourth beast and its ten horns
There have been countless attempts to identify whom the Antichrist is or will be. Most presumed identifications have resulted from illogical assumptions or fantastic imaginings. I believe that it may be possible to be certain of the Antichrist’s identity only or after the time that he “will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven’...”
Many prophecies in the Bible, particularly in the Old Testament, have more than one instance of fulfillment. Often, the last—and most profound—occurrence is in the future, at the “end of the age,” during the period known as the Day of the Lord. An example of this may be the use of the term “Assyrian” by the prophet Isaiah
The same passage
It seems evident, from
Both of the main branches of Islam, Sunni and Shia, seek the absolute destruction of Israel. I believe it is entirely plausible that the forces of Gog/Magog will be one branch of Islam and the forces of the Antichrist another branch, both vying to capture the ultimate “prize”: Israel.

The majority of the eastern portion of the former Roman Empire already is Islamic, and Islam could qualify as the “woman” riding the beast (see the woman and the beast), as seen by John
Another theory, espoused primarily by the Seventh Day Adventist Church, is that the beast will be united under Catholicism. I personally do not subscribe to this belief. However, I will present it here, for various reasons, one of which is that I do accept the premise that Saturday, not Sunday, is the proper Sabbath.
The belief is that the “eleventh horn”
One interpretation is that the antichrist spirit would pass through some or all of the papacy line. There are presumed evidences pointing to the latter. For one thing, the primary motives of the Popes during the Crusades of the Middle Ages were for political and territorial domination and for the expansion of their rule in the world, not for the spreading of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Rampant persecution was a part of this
John described the beast as uttering “proud words and blasphemies”
Thus, acting in the role of Christ or God (such as in claiming to forgive sins), and being portrayed or portraying oneself as equal to Christ or God, fulfill the definition of “blasphemy”—traits which some attribute to the Catholic clergy and the Pope.
One of the things Daniel indicated about this personification of the “eleventh horn” is that he would “try to change the set times and the laws”
Pertaining to the changing of laws, the Ten Commandments are accepted widely by Christians (both Protestants and Catholics alike) as irrevocable laws for mankind, written in stone by the hand of God and given to Moses to pass onto the Israelites. However, the list of Ten Commandments differs for Protestants and Catholics.
Protestants see Commandment #2
- #9: forbidding the coveting of your neighbor’s wife, as distinguished from
- #10: forbidding the coveting of your neighbor’s possessions or goods.
Some believe that, due to Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross, Christians no longer are bound by the laws defined in the Old Testament. Although this is true for ceremonial and ritual laws, it is not true for the Ten Commandments. Here are brief commentaries on the subject by Billy Graham and John Wesley:
God is unchanging. His specific laws (the Ten Commandments) are unchangeable, and they are separate and distinct from the laws of Moses:
Now, consider specifically Commandment #4
- the person’s name,
- the person’s title or office, and
- the territory or area over which the person has jurisdiction or rule.
Interestingly, we see the “official seal” of God “stamped” onto Commandment #4
- the Lord, or the Lord your God (YWVH)
- Creator or Maker
- the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them
This commandment, concerning the observance of the Sabbath, is the only commandment in which is contained God’s “seal” or “mark.” It can be argued that this is what gives the Ten Commandments validity and authority.
The “seventh day” is Saturday, the last day of the week. In numerous languages, the word “Saturday” incorporates into it the word “Sabbath” or some form of it:
The tradition of worshipping on Sunday in the Church (both Catholic and Protestant) has been widely accepted for centuries, mostly because Jesus was resurrected on the first day of the week
Nevertheless, there is no clear basis in Scripture for worshipping on a Sunday rather than on a Saturday, the latter clearly being the Sabbath. Worshipping on a Sunday merely is an ongoing tradition of the Church, both Catholic and Protestant.
Jesus said that He was the “Lord of the Sabbath”
Practically speaking, God should be worshipped and honored every day of the week. However, one day of the week should be set aside, where no regular work is done and where special focus is given to communion and personal relationship with God and study of His Word. The Scriptures indicate that this Sabbath day
Finally, a title of the Pope is said to be “Vicarius [or Vicarivs] Filii Dei” or Vicar of the Son of God. (“Vicar” means one serving as a substitute or agent.) Taking the Roman Numerals (I, V, L, C, and D) of that title and adding together their numerical equivalents, the result is 666, which is the “number of the beast”
In the 12th Century, St. Malachy O’Morgair, the Archbishop of Armagh, Ireland, prophesied a sequence of Popes to come. Here are St. Malachy’s names for the final five Popes:
Some believe that an end-time combination of Islam and Catholicism is a possibility for the domination of world power. It is pointed out that Catholicism already has incorporated certain aspects of ancient Babylon into its system of worship, such as
Radical Islam, and its holy book the Qur´an, clearly are anti-Semitic. Due to the somewhat anti-Semitic stance of the Catholic Church at times, it has been proposed that an alliance between the Islamic nations of the Middle East and the Catholic nations of Europe is a possibility.
- making Sunday the day of worship (as it was in ancient times for the sun god, Sol), rather than the Sabbath, Saturday, as was stipulated by Commandment #4
(Exodus 20:8-11); - considering idols and images as objects of veneration and worship;
- “goddess worship” (with Mary essentially being equivalent to the Queen of Heaven); and
- requiring the priesthood to be unmarried.
A potential scenario has John’s first beast
It has been said that the final Pope will be a “defector” from the Christian faith. Since Pope John Paul II (1920–2005) adhered strongly to Church doctrine and dogma, and Benedict XVI appears to have done the same, it raises the prospect that a successor may abandon basic Catholic/Christian tenets and move the opposite direction: toward embracing those of ancient Babylon instead. As such, he could be more likely, than any previous Pope, to point to a non-Christian leader—perhaps al Mahdi of Islam—as the best hope for peace and salvation for humanity, causing the whole world to worship the leader of that beast
Comments or questions? Email Me.
Copyright © 2004– by Ted M. Montgomery. All rights reserved.